Flywoo Explorer 4K vs GEPRC Crocodile Baby 4K - Micro Long Range Comparison

So far, Flywoo, iFlight and GEPRC has jumped onto the Micro Long Range bandwagon and you can check out the comparisons in the following links.

– Digital Micro Long Range

– Analog Micro Long Range

However, regarding split-cam version of Micro Long Range quads, only Flywoo and GEPRC has their own version of it. With iFlight missing out of this split-cam action, it makes me think whether is split-cam still a demand?

Personally, I still see some benefits of split-cam on such Micro Long Range comparing to having naked GoPro or Insta360 GO:

(1) You do not need to strip down a GoPro, though the GoPro video quality is still the best in FPV world!

(2) You are not bounded by Insta360 GO 5mins video footage. Especially on a Micro Long Range which definitely has more than 5mins of flight time!

(3) Having a split-cam on your quad makes things a lot easier as the HD camera and the FPV camera angle is always aligned. Plus, since it is part of the build, you just unpack and ripped. Making the whole flying workflow a lot faster if you are not really into cinematic FPV.

That is why I see the reason why Flywoo and GEPRC continue to produce a Micro Long Range with Caddx Tarsier. However, there is one thing to take note and that is Caddx Tarsier will disrupt the functionality of GPS module. To overcome this limitation, Flywoo mounted their GPS module on top of the lipo battery which is far away from the Caddx Tarsier chipboard module. But for GEPRC’s, I do not see the clear distance between the GPS module and Caddx Tarsier chipboard module, therefore, the GPS stability of GEPRC Crocodile Baby 4K still needs to be validated.

Without further ado, here’s the specification comparison between the two quads!